OTSLPSurveyNursing & health sciences2018

Taste, choice and timing: Investigating resident and carer preferences for meals in aged care homes.

Rachel Milte, Julie Ratcliffe, Gang Chen and 2 others

PMID 29314590

WHAT IT FOUND

Residents and family members said they preferred excellent-tasting food, choice over what to eat, and set mealtimes.

They said they would pay $24 a week for excellent taste. Flexible mealtimes were not preferred.

Key findings

01Participants preferred food that tasted excellent, and poor-tasting food was the attribute they avoided most strongly.

02Participants preferred meals at a set time rather than eating within a 1-2 hour range or anytime.

03Participants said they would pay an additional $24 per week for excellent-tasting food and $8 per week for a large amount of choice over serving size.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTsWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Residents with more severe cognitive impairment did not complete the questionnaire, so their own stated preferences are not represented. Family members chose scenarios they would prefer to see for the resident, not necessarily what the resident would choose. The choices were hypothetical dining scenarios, not a real change in food service, so the study does not show what would happen if facilities altered meal provision. The sample was 121 participants from three Australian facilities, so the findings may not apply to other settings or countries. Preference heterogeneity was examined only for two attributes, and the small sample led the authors to report the simpler conditional logit model.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read these preferences as evidence that changing meal service improves nutrition, satisfaction or health. Participants chose hypothetical scenarios and stated willingness to pay; the study did not test a food service change or measure resident outcomes.

Read it on PubMed →