Targeting heart failure rehospitalizations in a skilled nursing facility: A case report.
Mary A Dolansky, Luann Capone, Erin Leister and 1 others
PMID 27340005WHAT IT FOUND
The 43% to 30% drop in heart failure rehospitalizations at one skilled nursing facility after a bundle of HF care changes could be chance.
SNF stay under 7 days and primary HF diagnosis were linked to higher rehospitalization.
Key findings
01In one skilled nursing facility, heart failure rehospitalizations fell from 34 of 79 patients (43%) in 2008 to 35 of 115 patients (30%) in the post-implementation period, with p=0.07.
02Among 102 patients rehospitalized for unexpected symptoms (18 with HF, 84 without HF), over 70% of those with HF had cardiopulmonary symptoms versus 36% of those without HF (p=0.004).
03In the 115 patients with HF, rehospitalization was 19 of 47 (40%) with a primary HF diagnosis (p=0.05), 29 of 83 (35%) in the high-risk category (p=0.08), and 17 of 26 (65%) with SNF stay under 7 days (p=.04).
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The results came from only one institution, and the paper states they cannot be generalized. The main rehospitalization drop from 43% to 30% was reported with p=0.07. The facility changed several things at once, including specialty HF beds, coaching, staff training, patient education, dietician support, discharge planning, and a registry, so the paper cannot separate the effect of any single component. The registry was created manually and required staff time to read nursing notes, making data capture time consuming and potentially inaccurate. There was no standardization of documentation for reason for hospitalization, and SNF staff did not have a medical diagnosis at the time of transfer. The project was funded by an outside source.
Declared interests
The facility received grant funding to increase efforts to reduce rehospitalizations, and the paper states the project was funded by an outside source. No other conflicts of interest are reported in the supplied text.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that any single HF care change caused the drop in rehospitalizations. The facility added specialty HF beds, a nurse practitioner coach, a physician facilitator, staff training, patient education modules, dietician support, structured discharge planning, and a registry, and the paper does not separate their effects. The change from 43% to 30% had p=0.07, and the paper states the results came from only one institution and cannot be generalized.