RNCohortHolistic nursing practice2025

Symptom Burden and Quality of Life in Inpatient Palliative Care: Prospective Evaluation With IPOS-POL.

Monika Grochowicka, Wojciech Leppert, Małgorzata Reysner and 5 others

PMID 41031697

WHAT IT FOUND

Overall symptom burden did not change significantly from admission to reassessment, but patient-reported psychosocial distress increased.

Staff ratings were lower than patient ratings for total burden and distress.

Key findings

01The overall IPOS score did not change significantly between the first and second assessments (p = 0.3603), but patient-reported psychosocial distress increased (p = 0.0217).

02Patient-reported IPOS total and psychosocial distress scores were higher than staff-assessed scores at both assessments.

03Bedridden patients had higher low mobility (p = 0.0029), pain (p = 0.0146), and vomiting (p = 0.0268) scores, while ambulatory patients had higher anxiety (p = 0.0044).

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study was done in one hospital palliative care unit, so its findings may not apply to home or hospice palliative care. There was no control group, so the results cannot show whether inpatient palliative care caused the observed symptom changes. Only seven days were observed, which is too short to describe longer-term symptom trajectories or sustained improvement. Fifteen patients did not complete the second assessment because of death, discharge, or cognitive decline, although their baseline characteristics were similar to those who completed the study. The IPOS-POL was validated mainly in advanced cancer, so its use in the non-oncological group is exploratory and may be less reliable for that subgroup. The study was exploratory and did not correct for multiple comparisons, so some subgroup differences may be chance findings. Patients with cognitive impairment, severe disease progression, or inability to consent were excluded, so the results do not cover all palliative inpatients.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that inpatient palliative care had no effect because the total IPOS score was stable. The total score did not change significantly, but patient-reported psychosocial distress increased, and the study had no control group, so it cannot establish what palliative care caused.

Read it on PubMed →