SLPPilotDysphagia2022

Swallowing Outcomes Following Voice Therapy in Multiple System Atrophy with Dysphagia: Comparison of Treatment Efficacy with Parkinson's Disease.

Alyssa Park, Su-Jeong Jang, No-Eul Kim and 4 others

PMID 33666739

WHAT IT FOUND

After 16 LSVT-LOUD voice therapy sessions, 13 patients with Parkinson’s disease or MSA-C had better swallowing scores on a thin-liquid X-ray test.

The study was small and uncontrolled, and MSA-C swallowing gains were not clearly kept at follow-up.

Key findings

01Thirteen patients with Parkinson’s disease or MSA-C received 16 LSVT-LOUD sessions over one month, with follow-up about three months later.

02Across both groups, maximum phonation time and pharyngeal swallowing scores showed significant change over time after treatment.

03In the MSA-C group, swallowing scores improved right after treatment but did not show significant improvement from pretest to follow-up.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

There was no control group, so it cannot show whether changes were due to LSVT-LOUD alone. Only 13 patients were studied, 6 with Parkinson’s disease and 7 with MSA-C. The sample is small. Baseline NIH Swallowing Safety Scale scores were low severity. That leaves little room to show improvement on that measure. MSA-C swallowing improvements were not significant at follow-up. Maintenance is uncertain. All participants were taking antiparkinson medication, which was not changed. Ongoing medication effects cannot be separated from the therapy. Follow-up was only about three months. The authors describe the work as a pilot study.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that LSVT-LOUD is proven to improve swallowing in MSA-C. The study had no control group and only 13 patients, and MSA-C swallowing scores were not significantly better at follow-up than before treatment.

Read it on PubMed →