PTOTSystematic ReviewJournal of occupational rehabilitation2019

Sustainable Return to Work: A Systematic Review Focusing on Personal and Social Factors.

Abasiama Etuknwa, Kevin Daniels, Constanze Eib

PMID 30767151

WHAT IT FOUND

Support from managers and colleagues, positive attitude, confidence, younger age and higher education were most consistently linked with staying back at work after musculoskeletal or mental health absence.

No single factor explained sustainable return.

Key findings

01Support from leaders and support from co-workers were among the factors most consistently associated with sustainable return to work for both musculoskeletal and common mental disorder groups.

02Positive attitude, high self-efficacy, younger age and higher education were also consistently linked with sustainable return to work.

03Gender effects were inconsistent, and job crafting had too few studies for firm conclusions.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The review did not meta-analyse because outcome measures were very heterogeneous. Many included studies were observational or qualitative, so they show associations rather than proving that a factor causes sustainable return. The authors included studies in the summary even if some quality answers were no or can't tell. Only the first author screened all citations, and only 30% were checked by other authors, so selection bias is possible. Unpublished studies may have been missed. Some factors had very low confidence because only two studies or contradictory results were found. Gender results were inconsistent, and job crafting had too few studies for firm conclusions.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the consistent links as proof that improving self-efficacy or manager support will cause sustainable return to work. The review synthesises observational and intervention studies with mixed designs, and some factors showed no effect or inconsistent effects.

Read it on PubMed →