SLPOtherThe Journal of head trauma rehabilitation2024

Summary of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Self-reported Traumatic Brain Injury Survey Efforts.

Jill Daugherty, Alexis Peterson, Lindsey Black and 1 others

PMID 39038104

WHAT IT FOUND

Self-reported concussion prevalence is far higher than hospital data, but estimates swing wildly based on survey wording.

Asking about 'concussion' yields much higher rates than 'mild traumatic brain injury', and listing symptoms individually raises reported prevalence compared to single questions.

Key findings

01Asking respondents about 'concussion' resulted in significantly higher self-reported prevalence than asking about 'mild traumatic brain injury', despite the terms being clinically synonymous.

02Surveys using a 'select all that apply' format for symptoms yielded higher TBI prevalence estimates than those using a single comprehensive question.

03Self-reported past-year TBI prevalence in adults ranged from 2% to 12%, and lifetime prevalence ranged from 19% to 29%, substantially exceeding hospitalization-based estimates.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

All data are self-reported and subject to recall bias, particularly for lifetime prevalence. There is no gold standard for self-report survey questions, so definitions and formats varied across the included surveys. Some surveys did not use weighted data or report confidence intervals, limiting comparability. The term 'concussion' may be misunderstood by the public, potentially leading to both over- and under-estimation of true prevalence.

Declared interests

None of the authors have conflicts to declare.

The easy way to misread this

Do not treat these prevalence estimates as a single accurate number for TBI incidence. The wide variation in reported rates (e.g., 2% to 12% for past-year adult TBI) is largely driven by how the question was asked, not just by actual differences in injury rates.

Read it on PubMed →