PTOtherNeurorehabilitation and neural repair2026

Steps to Health: Backward Walking Predicts Physical Activity Levels in Multiple Sclerosis.

Michael VanNostrand, Patrick G Monaghan, Taylor N Takla and 1 others

PMID 41574759

WHAT IT FOUND

Slower backward walking identified people with MS who did not reach 7500 steps daily over 3 months, with cutoffs of 0.89 m/s comfortable and 1.25 m/s fast.

Key findings

01Backward walking speed was the only measure that remained in the comfortable walking prediction model.

02The comfortable backward walking model classified 80% of participants correctly, with a threshold of 0.89 m/s.

03When backward walking was excluded, self-reported walking capacity was a predictor, with 68.9% classification accuracy.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Only 45 participants were analysed, so the models may not apply to other groups. The sample had mild walking difficulty on average, with a median PDDS score of 1, so it may not apply to people with more severe MS-related mobility impairment. The study was observational and did not test whether changing backward walking changes physical activity. The cutoffs were derived in this sample and not tested in a new group. Only total step count was measured, not activity intensity, duration, or sedentary behaviour. One participant was excluded because they did not meet Fitbit wear-time requirements. The study did not account for environment, depression or anxiety, which can influence activity.

Declared interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest. The supplied text does not report a funding source.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that training backward walking will increase physical activity. This was an observational prediction study in 45 people with mild MS, and no intervention was tested.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →