Stair walking is associated with returning home after inpatient stroke rehabilitation in Belgium and Switzerland: a multicentric retrospective study.
Odile Chevalley, Emmanuelle Opsommer, Steven Truijen and 4 others
PMID 41623684WHAT IT FOUND
Stroke patients who could manage stairs at discharge, even with difficulty, were much more likely to go home than those who could not, once living situation and memory problems were accounted for. 1475 patients, three centres.
Key findings
01Stair ability at discharge was the variable most strongly linked to going home. Compared with patients who could not manage stairs at all, those who were partially independent had 5.83 times the odds of going home (95% CI 3.67 to 9.26) and those who were independent 14.31 times the odds (95% CI 9.34 to 21.93), after adjusting for living arrangement and cognitive impairment.
02Only three variables survived in the final model: independence in stair walking, living arrangement and cognitive impairment. That model was built on 648 of the 1475 patients, the 43.9% with complete records.
03Just under two thirds of patients went home (62%); the rest went to nursing homes (13%), further rehabilitation (14%) or other hospitals (9%).
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Only patients with complete records were used, so the final model rests on 648 of the 1475 patients, 43.9% of them. Those patients may differ from the ones excluded, and the missing data was large enough that the authors say it may introduce selection bias. The data came from routine records rather than a standardised assessment schedule, and the three centres used different measures, so independence had to be grouped into broad levels and many variables were too incomplete to use at all. Admission data were less complete than discharge data, and the model was not adjusted for differences between centres, so some of the variation between the Belgian and Swiss results may reflect the centres rather than the patients. Data collection for 2020 and 2021 ran through the COVID-19 pandemic, which affected stroke presentation rates and access to rehabilitation. The design is retrospective and observational, so it describes which patients went home, not what causes a patient to go home or what would change the outcome if you did it.
Declared interests
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship or publication of the article, and the research received no specific grant from any public, commercial or not-for-profit funding body.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read this as proof that training stair walking gets patients home. It is a retrospective look at records, so it shows that patients who could manage stairs were more likely to be discharged home, not that improving stair ability causes that to happen. Only 648 of the 1475 patients had complete data for the model, so the size of the association may shift in other groups.
Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →