SLPOtherJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2021

Speech Movement Variability in People Who Stutter: A Vocal Tract Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.

Charlotte E E Wiltshire, Mark Chiew, Jennifer Chesters and 2 others

PMID 34157239

WHAT IT FOUND

During fluent nonsense-word repetition, adults who stutter had more variable lip, tongue and soft palate movements than fluent controls.

They also took longer on longer or more complex words. Variability did not track stuttering severity.

Key findings

01People who stutter showed greater variability than fluent controls in lip, tongue and soft palate movements during fluent pseudoword repetitions.

02People who stutter took significantly longer to produce longer and more complex pseudowords than fluent controls.

03Movement variability during fluent pseudoword repetitions was not related to measured stuttering severity.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study included only adults with developmental stuttering who had at least mild severity, so it does not tell us what happens in children or in people with other speech or neurological conditions. The analysis used repeated pseudowords inside an MRI scanner, not connected speech or everyday conversation, so it may not show how these movements behave during real communication. The MRI method sampled movement at 33.3 frames per second and did not use a carrier phrase, which the authors say made timing of very short words less precise and may explain the unexpected high variability for the one-syllable word. The pseudowords were mostly bilabial sounds, so the soft palate had limited movement to make, and the task may not represent a full range of speech sounds. Nearly all participants had prior speech therapy, but the type and duration varied, and the researchers could not separate the possible effect of earlier therapy from the movement measurements. Many people who stutter had variability scores within the range of fluent controls, so this pattern is not a clean diagnostic marker.

Declared interests

The work was supported by UK research councils and the Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging. Charlotte Wiltshire was supported by an Economic and Social Research Council UK DPhil scholarship and an Engineering and Physical Science Research Council UK scholarship, Mark Chiew by the Royal Academy of Engineering, the study by the Medical Research Council UK, and the Wellcome Centre by Wellcome Trust core funding. The supplied text does not report other conflicts of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not treat greater movement variability as a diagnostic sign of stuttering or as a measure of severity. Many participants who stutter had variability within the fluent control range, and no relationship was found between variability and SSI-4 score.

Read it on PubMed →