SLPSurveyThe South African journal of communication disorders = Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings2025

South African speech-language therapists' views on dysphagia in head and neck cancer patients.

Mishta Gungadeen, Jeannie Van der Linde, Marien A Graham and 1 others

PMID 41405066

WHAT IT FOUND

South African speech-language therapists described varied swallowing care for head and neck cancer.

Most did not use instrumental assessments for all patients at first. Access and radiation exposure influenced that choice. They agreed treatment should change with surgery, but most had no workplace protocol.

Key findings

01Half of the participants used screening measures to identify head and neck cancer patients who needed post-operative swallowing management.

02Eleven participants would not conduct an instrumental swallowing assessment on all patients during initial stages, and limited access and radiation exposure influenced that decision.

03All 14 respondents agreed that swallowing intervention should differ according to the surgical procedure.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Only 14 South African speech-language therapists answered, so these views may not represent all therapists who manage head and neck cancer swallowing. Participants were chosen because they had experience with head and neck cancer swallowing, so therapists without that experience were not described. The study asked therapists to report their own practices, which can be affected by memory and personal experience. No patient outcomes were measured, so the paper cannot show whether the reported practices improved swallowing, nutrition, or aspiration risk. The paper notes that South Africa lacks published swallowing and communication protocols for head and neck cancer, so there was no local standard to compare practice against.

Declared interests

The authors reported no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read this as evidence that a particular swallowing assessment or treatment improves head and neck cancer outcomes. The study reported what 14 speech-language therapists said they do, not what happened to patients.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →