SLPRCTJournal of autism and developmental disorders2020

SOLACE: A Psychosocial Stigma Protection Intervention to Improve the Mental Health of Parents of Autistic Children-A Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial.

Annemarie Lodder, Chris Papadopoulos, Gurch Randhawa

PMID 32323046

WHAT IT FOUND

Parents of newly diagnosed autistic children who joined SOLACE, a stigma-focused group, reported better mental health and less stigma than controls.

However, the study was underpowered, and the primary goal was testing feasibility, not proving effectiveness.

Key findings

01The SOLACE group reported significantly higher mental health scores at six-week follow-up compared to baseline, while the control group showed no significant change over time.

02Participants in the SOLACE group reported significantly lower levels of courtesy stigma and affiliate stigma (self-stigma) than the control group at both post-intervention and follow-up.

03The study failed to meet its recruitment target of 24 participants, enrolling only 17, which limits the statistical power and certainty of the effectiveness findings.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study was a feasibility trial with a very small sample (17 participants), making it underpowered to draw firm conclusions about effectiveness. The recruitment target of 24 was not met, which limits the generalisability of the findings. There were significant baseline imbalances between the groups, particularly in social support and self-blame, which may have influenced the results. The study relied on self-report measures, which can be subject to bias. The qualitative focus group was led by the intervention facilitator, which may have inhibited participants from sharing negative feedback. Double-blinding was not possible, and participants knew whether they were receiving the intervention.

Declared interests

The study was funded by Autistica, a charity dedicated to funding autism research. The authors declared no other conflicts of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not interpret the significant improvements in mental health and stigma as proof that SOLACE is an effective treatment. This was a small feasibility trial that failed to meet its recruitment target, so the results are preliminary and underpowered; the primary finding is that the intervention is acceptable and feasible to deliver, not that it works.

Read it on PubMed →