Social and health impacts of exoskeleton use on care workers.
Riika Saurio, Satu Pekkarinen, Pihla Säynäjäkangas and 4 others
PMID 40368404WHAT IT FOUND
A back-support suit worn by care workers for three weeks did not significantly lower measured muscle activity in real shifts, and discomfort rose while wearing it.
Nurses said it helped their posture and bed care, but remembering to activate it added to their load.
Key findings
01Muscle activity averaged 9.3% of each nurse's maximum over a whole workday without the suit and 8.6% with it, but no individual muscle and no work task showed a statistically significant difference between the two shifts.
02Heart rate and metabolic strain did not differ significantly between shifts with and without the suit, and perceived exertion changed only slightly, but perceived discomfort rose significantly over the shift when the suit was worn (p = 0.022) while staying level without it; the change between the two conditions was not statistically significant.
03Nurses described the suit as most useful for bed care and other forward-leaning work, said it helped them keep a better posture, but reported that remembering to activate and deactivate it was the biggest challenge and added to their already busy workload.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Only eight care workers in one care home took part, seven in the measurements, and there was no control group: each nurse was compared with themselves on a different shift, so the study cannot say what would have happened without the suit over the same period. Some work tasks were measured in very few people, down to one nurse for bathing, so none of the task-level figures can support a conclusion. The nurses were volunteers and knew they were being studied. Several said this made them more careful about ergonomics, which may have hidden any benefit of the suit. The trial lasted three weeks, which nurses themselves said was too short and which for some working shifts meant only a few opportunities to use the suit. Only one passive exoskeleton model was tested, so the results say nothing about powered exoskeletons or other devices. Nurses filled in the diaries as they chose, so the record of how often and for which tasks the suit was actually used is incomplete. The authors state the measurements were there to support the interviews rather than to be a test with enough people to detect a difference on their own.
Declared interests
The study was paid for by the Finnish Work Environment Fund (grant 210359), a public funder, as part of the TUEKS project 'Exoskeletons and Caregivers' Changing Daily Work'. The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest. No role for the exoskeleton manufacturer is reported.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read the lower muscle activity with the suit as proof that it reduces strain at work. Averaged over the workday the figures were 9.3% versus 8.6% of each nurse's maximum, and none of the differences, in any muscle or any task, reached statistical significance; the 7% average reduction mentioned in the discussion is the authors' description of that same non-significant trend. The one significant result went the other way, with discomfort rising during the shift when the suit was worn, though that rise was measured within the suit condition and the two shifts were not directly different from each other.
Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →