RNSystematic ReviewInternational nursing review2025

Sleep-enhancing nursing interventions in hospital wards: A systematic review.

Sílvia Caldeira Mendonça, Diogo Máximo Sabino Martins, Cândida Durão and 2 others

PMID 39690500

WHAT IT FOUND

Nursing ward sleep interventions were linked to better adult inpatient sleep in several studies, but evidence was too varied to confirm a best approach.

Key findings

01The review grouped sleep-enhancing nursing interventions into eight areas: communication and education, sensory interventions, daily activity planning, environmental control, dietary interventions, sleep assessment, symptom control, and individualized care.

02Environmental control included working quietly at night, answering calls quietly, admitting new patients quietly, bundling care, scheduling non-urgent tests by day, addressing medical device issues within five alarms, dimming lights, and offering eye masks or ear plugs.

03Symptom control focused on pain and anxiety, with daily pain assessment, pharmacological and non-pharmacological relief, and calming measures such as deep breathing, prayer, guided imagery, or lavender aromatherapy.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The included studies used different designs, patient groups, and interventions, so the review could not combine their results into an overall estimate. Several included studies were rated at high risk of bias, and many randomized trials did not blind participants, staff, or outcome assessors. The review excluded intensive care, emergency, and operating room settings, so it does not speak to sleep care in those units. The studies came from several countries and patient populations, so the interventions may not transfer directly to every ward. Many interventions were delivered as bundled programs, so the contribution of any single component could not be separated. Qualitative and cross-sectional studies describe experiences and current practice, not treatment effects.

Declared interests

The authors declared no conflicts of interest and reported no specific funding.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that any single nursing intervention is proven to improve hospital sleep. The review found many different bundled approaches, several studies had high risk of bias, and the evidence was not strong enough to identify a best treatment.

Read it on PubMed →