Simultaneous X-ray Video-Fluoroscopy and Pulsed Ultrasound Velocimetry Analyses of the Pharyngeal Phase of Swallowing of Boluses with Different Rheological Properties.
Waqas M Qazi, Olle Ekberg, Johan Wiklund and 2 others
PMID 32048021WHAT IT FOUND
The study did not detect a difference in bolus speed or clearance-wave speed among fluids matched for viscosity in three healthy adults.
Ultrasound velocity profiling measured flow and detected the clearance wave.
Key findings
01Bolus head velocity did not differ statistically significantly between the tested fluids.
02Contraction wave speed showed no statistically significant differences across fluid rheologies or between X-ray video-fluoroscopy and ultrasound velocity profiling.
03Ultrasound velocity profiling measured pharyngeal bolus velocities, and its differences from X-ray video-fluoroscopy were not statistically significant.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Only three healthy adults were studied, so the paper cannot show what happens in patients with dysphagia. The outcomes were bolus speed and contraction wave speed, not aspiration, residue, swallowing safety, or clinical function. The fluids were all about 150 mPas at 50 s-1 and were mixed with contrast media, which may have reduced the rheological differences tested. The sample was small, with three sips per fluid per subject, and no randomisation or blinding is described. X-ray video-fluoroscopy used 16 frames per second, and the ultrasound probe angle and measurement region were set for this preliminary study, so neither method is shown to be clinically ready.
Declared interests
The supplied text does not include a conflicts-of-interest declaration; the article is labelled Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that fluids with different elasticity or shear thinning have the same clinical swallowing effect, or that ultrasound velocity profiling can replace video-fluoroscopy for dysphagia care. The study had only three healthy adults, tested fluids matched for viscosity, and measured speed rather than aspiration, residue, or swallowing safety.