SLPCase-ControlJournal of autism and developmental disorders2019

Signing with the Face: Emotional Expression in Narrative Production in Deaf Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Tanya Denmark, Joanna Atkinson, Ruth Campbell and 1 others

PMID 30267252

WHAT IT FOUND

Deaf children with autism produced a similar total number of facial actions to deaf controls, but fewer exactly matched adult signers, especially for demand and mischief.

Key findings

01The two groups produced a similar total number of facial action targets.

02Deaf children with autism spectrum disorder produced fewer facial actions for demand and mischief than deaf controls.

03The autism spectrum disorder group produced fewer expressions identical to adult native signers than controls.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The sample was small, with 12 typically developing deaf participants and 10 deaf participants with autism spectrum disorder. The BSL Production Test is designed for ages 4 to 11, but participants were aged 8.5 to 17. The first rater knew which group each participant was in, although a blind second rater rescored a sample and raters reached consensus. Only a narrow range of emotional expressions was tested, and the study did not directly assess imitation, motor skills or theory of mind. Some participants used hearing aids or cochlear implants, so auditory input may have affected communication. The small sample may have made it hard to detect true differences, so null findings for total facial actions and some expressions need caution.

Declared interests

The supplied text reports funding by the Economic and Social Research Council. It does not report author conflicts of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that deaf children with autism produce fewer facial expressions overall. The total number of facial action targets did not differ significantly between groups. The differences were in exact match to adult signers and in demand and mischief.

Read it on PubMed →