PTOtherJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2025

Should you hold onto the treadmill handrails or not? Cortical evidence at different walking speeds.

Monica Biggio, Costanza Iester, Davide Cattaneo and 6 others

PMID 39815334

WHAT IT FOUND

In 24 healthy adults walking on a treadmill, faster speed without handrails increased brain activity and connectivity in frontoparietal areas.

Holding the handrails flattened these speed differences. This is a neuroimaging finding, not evidence that either method improves clinical gait outcomes.

Key findings

01Walking at 5 km/h without handrails produced higher oxyhemoglobin activation in several frontoparietal and sensorimotor regions than walking at 3 km/h without handrails.

02Holding the handrails removed these speed-related activation differences in those same regions, except for left BA40, which still showed higher activation at 5 km/h.

03Task-based functional connectivity between left BA10 and left BA40 was high at 5 km/h without handrails but near zero at 3 km/h with handrails.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The sample was 24 healthy young adults with no neurological or orthopedic conditions, so the findings may not transfer to the older or neurological populations who typically receive treadmill rehabilitation. The study measured cortical activation and connectivity only. It collected no behavioral gait data, no clinical outcomes and no measure of muscular workload, so it cannot show that any pattern of activation leads to better walking or recovery. The authors state that no significant differences were found when comparing holding versus not holding at the same speed, so the paper does not establish that handrails themselves reduce activation relative to unsupported walking. The speeds used were 3 and 5 km/h, which the authors describe as not demanding for healthy subjects; the effect of handrails at the slower, more typical speeds used in neurological rehabilitation is unknown. The study was small and exploratory, and the authors themselves call for further work in patients with neurological disease.

Declared interests

Funded by the Italian Multiple Sclerosis Foundation (FISM Grant). No other conflicts of interest are reported in the supplied text.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the increased cortical activity at faster unsupported speeds as proof that dropping the handrails will improve a patient's gait or recovery. The study measured brain activation in 24 healthy adults, collected no behavioral or clinical outcomes, and found no significant difference in activation between holding and not holding at the same speed.

Read it on PubMed →