SLPSurveyAutism : the international journal of research and practice2024

Short report: Evaluation of wider community support for a neurodiversity teaching programme designed using participatory methods.

Reesha Zahir, Alyssa M Alcorn, Sarah McGeown and 4 others

PMID 37942511

WHAT IT FOUND

91% of adults consulted about a planned neurodiversity school programme supported its goals and content.

The neurodiversity definition received 73% support, and 23% wanted changes.

Key findings

0191% of respondents supported using the planned programme based on its description and goals.

0273% supported the planned neurodiversity definition, and 23% wanted changes.

03Open-ended concerns were mostly about terminology and unclear concepts, but suggestions varied with no clear consensus.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The analysed sample was 111 adults who responded to social media and neurodiversity-aware advertising. Respondents were mostly white, female and already familiar with neurodiversity, and 70% reported being neurodivergent. The sample was concentrated in autism and Asperger's diagnoses, with other neurodivergent groups and neurotypical people under-represented. Over 80% of excluded respondents stopped after the consent form, and the survey's length and text load may have excluded some neurodivergent groups. Open-ended comments were analysed by one author only. The survey rated planned content before the resource was completed, not pupil outcomes.

Declared interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest. The project was supported by the Salvesen Mindroom Research Centre Scientific Advisory Board and the Wellcome Trust, grant 218493/Z/19/Z.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the high support for the planned LEANS content as proof that the programme works in schools. This was a survey of adults about proposed curriculum components, not a pupil outcome study.

Read it on PubMed →