SLPOtherAutism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research2022

Separate scoring algorithms for specific identification priorities optimize the screening properties of the Screening Tool for Autism in Toddlers (STAT).

Shana M Attar, Lisa V Ibanez, Wendy L Stone

PMID 36073529

WHAT IT FOUND

Adding examiner ratings of social engagement and atypical behavior to the STAT screening tool increased sensitivity for identifying autism risk in two-year-olds.

This approach helps catch more at-risk children but lowers specificity, meaning more false positives.

Key findings

01The expanded STAT-E with original scoring had lower sensitivity (0.67) and specificity (0.66) in this sample compared to previous validation studies.

02Adding social engagement and atypical behavior ratings significantly increased sensitivity to 0.77, though specificity dropped to 0.62.

03Novice assessors trained via a web module achieved reasonable screening properties, suggesting broader implementation is feasible.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The sample was predominantly White and male, limiting generalizability across race, ethnicity, and sex. Reliability checks were not performed on the new social engagement and atypical behavior ratings. The study combined novice assessors with experimental ratings, making it unclear if the results apply to experienced clinicians. The atypical behavior rating was rarely endorsed, which may be because these behaviors emerge later in childhood.

Declared interests

WS is an author of the STAT and receives an author's share of royalties from Vanderbilt University for sales.

The easy way to misread this

Do not assume the new scoring algorithm is superior for all contexts. It increases sensitivity but decreases specificity, meaning it will identify more children as at-risk who do not have autism. This trade-off may overwhelm referral systems if not managed carefully.

Read it on PubMed →