Safety and Feasibility of Early Aquatic Physical Therapy for Military Survivors of Gunshot Wounds and Blast Injuries: A Case Series.
Caroline Barmatz, Melissa Crowe, Erik Biros and 3 others
PMID 42769314WHAT IT FOUND
All 3 military patients with gunshot or blast wounds received early aquatic therapy alongside acute multidisciplinary care and land-based rehabilitation without adverse events or wound infection.
Each showed functional gains and returned to duty, but the case series cannot separate the aquatic component.
Key findings
01Early aquatic physical therapy was safe and feasible for all 3 patients, with no adverse events or secondary wound infections.
02FIM scores improved from 101 to 112, from 115 to 120, and from 75 to 93.
03Each patient returned to work or active duty after rehabilitation.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Only 3 patients were reported, and all were male military personnel injured in one mass casualty incident. There was no control group, so the results cannot show that early aquatic physical therapy caused the functional gains. Patients also received acute multidisciplinary care, land-based rehabilitation, and supervised aquatic therapy, so the contribution of the aquatic component cannot be separated. The authors noted small sample size and potential confirmation bias. No adverse events in 3 patients does not establish safety for other populations, because patients with systemic infection, dermatologic conditions, infected wounds, or pleural drains were excluded. The pools were inside a rehabilitation hospital with physiotherapists, hydrotherapists, and lifeguards nearby, so feasibility may not transfer to settings without that support.
Declared interests
The investigators reported no financial or nonfinancial disclosures.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that early aquatic physical therapy alone caused the improvements or is safe for all patients. The report has only 3 patients, all received acute multidisciplinary care and land-based rehabilitation, and the authors noted small sample size and potential confirmation bias.