Safety and efficacy of robotic elbow training using the upper limb single-joint hybrid assistive limb combined with conventional rehabilitation for bilateral obstetric brachial plexus injury with co-contraction: a case report.
Shigeki Kubota, Hirotaka Mutsuzaki, Kenichi Yoshikawa and 5 others
PMID 30858664WHAT IT FOUND
In an adult with brachial plexus injury and cocontraction, robot elbow training plus usual rehab was completed without serious adverse events.
Some elbow motion, left elbow power, and right hand and self-reported function scores improved, while other measures did not.
Key findings
01The patient completed all 12 sessions for each side, and no serious adverse events were observed during upper limb HAL-SJ training.
02After 12 sessions, improvements were observed in left handheld dynamometer testing, active flexion range of both elbows, right STEF, and right DASH.
03No changes from baseline were observed in MRC grade and right handheld dynamometer testing, and left STEF and left DASH scores were equal to or slightly worsened after 12 sessions.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
This is a case report, so it describes a patient's response rather than a comparison group. The patient also received conventional rehabilitation, so the contribution of HAL-SJ alone cannot be separated. Some outcomes did not improve: MRC grade and right handheld dynamometer testing were unchanged, and left STEF and left DASH scores were equal to or slightly worsened. Long-term effects were not assessed after HAL-SJ training. The authors did not measure deltoid muscle activity during HAL-SJ training, so the proposed inhibition of cocontraction was not shown. The patient had normal passive range of motion and no joint contractures, so it may not apply to patients with more restricted joints. The authors note fatigue and session frequency may have influenced results.
Declared interests
This work was supported by grants from Ibaraki Prefectural University of Health Sciences, the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, and the Japan Orthopaedics and Traumatology Research Foundation. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that the robot alone caused the improvements. The patient also received conventional rehabilitation during the same 12 sessions, and the authors state it is difficult to determine the main effect of the therapy. This is a case report, so it cannot show that the intervention works.