PTOTCohortPM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation2025

Risk of septic arthritis after corticosteroid joint injections: A retrospective propensity score-matched cohort analysis.

Claire Cooper, Reuben Horace, Richard Wilson

PMID 40607839

WHAT IT FOUND

Large joint corticosteroid injections did not increase the risk of septic arthritis compared to matched patients who did not receive injections.

The absolute risk of infection within 21 days was 0.0018, or 18 cases per 10,000 individuals.

Key findings

01The risk difference for septic arthritis within 21 days was negative, indicating no increased risk after large joint corticosteroid injections compared to controls.

02The absolute risk of septic arthritis after a large joint injection was 0.0018, equivalent to 18 cases per 10,000 individuals.

03The study suggests current clinical practices do not increase the risk of septic arthritis within 21 days of large joint injections.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study relied on electronic health records, which lack clinical details like physical exam findings and may contain documentation errors. The injection codes did not specify which large joint was treated, so risk could not be compared between joints like knees versus shoulders. Data from the TriNetX network cannot capture patients who sought care for septic arthritis outside the included health systems. The authors acknowledge potential unmeasured selection bias, where clinicians may have avoided injecting patients with higher infection risks, which matching could not fully correct.

Declared interests

Dr Wilson serves as Deputy Editor of PM&R. No other disclosures were reported.

The easy way to misread this

Do not interpret the negative risk difference as evidence that injections are protective against infection. The authors attribute this finding to unmeasured selection bias, where clinicians likely avoided injecting patients with higher baseline risk factors.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →