RNCohortNursing & health sciences2022

Risk factors of paternal postnatal depression in Pakistan: Findings from an urban sample.

Maria Atif, Mark Halaki, Chin Moi Chow and 1 others

PMID 35596259

WHAT IT FOUND

New fathers whose wives screened positive for depression were far more likely to be depressed themselves.

Fathers reporting their own sleep disturbance also faced higher odds of postnatal depression. These two factors stood out after adjusting for age, income, and marital satisfaction.

Key findings

01A spouse's positive depression screen (EPDS >12) was associated with paternal postnatal depression with an adjusted odds ratio of 13.04 (95% CI 1.82-28.37).

02The father's own sleep disturbance was associated with paternal postnatal depression with an adjusted odds ratio of 9.40 (95% CI 1.09-21.62).

0323.5% of the 51 participants scored more than 10 on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, indicating positive screening for postnatal depression.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The sample size was small (n=51), which limits the generalizability of the findings and may affect the stability of the odds ratios. Recruitment occurred through the participants' wives, which may have introduced selection bias. The study used the EPDS, a screening tool, rather than a clinical diagnosis, which may overestimate true prevalence. The cross-sectional nature of the data collection means temporal relationships between risk factors and depression cannot be established.

Declared interests

None declared.

The easy way to misread this

Do not assume that financial hardship or marital satisfaction are independent predictors of paternal depression in this context, as they lost significance in the adjusted model. The strong association with spouse's depression does not prove causation due to the cross-sectional design.

Read it on PubMed →