Risk Factors for Pressure Injury in ICU Patients.
Yang Chaonan, Chaohui Ji, Pan Huibin and 2 others
PMID 41618576WHAT IT FOUND
ICU patients with co-morbidities, MEWS score of 5 or more, sedative use, Braden nutrition score, skin oedema or faecal incontinence were identified as at higher risk for hospital-acquired pressure injury.
Nurses can use these markers to prioritise skin checks and repositioning.
Key findings
01A total of 197 ICU patients were analysed, and 53 patients developed 63 pressure injuries.
02Co-morbidities, MEWS score of 5 or more, sedatives, Braden nutrition sub-index, skin oedema and faecal incontinence were independent risk factors.
03Faecal incontinence was independently associated with pressure injury, with an odds ratio of 13.17.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The study was retrospective and single centre, so the findings may not apply to other ICUs. Cases were identified through the adverse event system, which may have missed or biased pressure injury identification. Pressure injury diagnosis and staging relied on nursing records, so details may be incomplete. Important prevention factors were not recorded, including duration of mechanical ventilation, ARDS, bed or mattress type, and nurse/patient ratio. Patients with a Braden score below 10 were excluded, so the sample may not represent the highest-risk patients. Sedative and vasoactive drug exposure was defined only as concurrent use of two or more named drugs, without dose or duration. Missing data for BMI, C-reactive protein and blood viscosity were imputed, which may affect the estimates.
Declared interests
The funding statement says the work was supported by, but no funder is named. No conflict of interest declaration is given.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read the odds ratios as proof that any factor caused pressure injury or that changing it will prevent pressure injury. The study was retrospective, cases were identified through an adverse event system, and important prevention variables such as bed type and nurse to patient ratio were not recorded.