RNCase-ControlAmerican journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses2016

Risk Factors for Bacteremia in Patients With Urinary Catheter-Associated Bacteriuria.

Laurie J Conway, Jianfang Liu, Anthony D Harris and 1 others

PMID 27965229

WHAT IT FOUND

Hospitalized patients with a positive urine culture from a catheter who kept the catheter after the culture were more likely to develop bloodstream infection.

Male sex, immunosuppressants, urinary tract procedures, and longer stay before culture were also linked to bloodstream infection.

Key findings

01After other factors were considered, patients whose urinary catheter was still in place after the positive urine culture were more likely to develop bloodstream infection.

02Male sex, urinary tract procedures, immunosuppressant treatment, and longer hospital stay before the positive urine culture were also linked to bloodstream infection.

03Enterococcal urinary infection was linked to lower odds of bloodstream infection than other urinary pathogens.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The data were retrospective, so coding of comorbid conditions and specimen collection may have been incomplete or incorrect. Catheter data came from records completed by nurses, and only patients with recorded placement and removal dates were included; missed removal dates could underrepresent patients whose catheters were removed. Catheter type, placement method, placement location, catheter care procedures, and catheterization before admission were not available. Severity of illness at the time of the positive urine culture was not controlled, so patients who kept catheters may have been sicker. Chronic catheterization was not identified, so it may have affected the association between a catheter left in place and bacteremia. Controls were selected from patients without positive blood cultures, so some may have had sepsis but negative or missing cultures. A urinary tract procedure was coded at any time during admission, so it may have occurred after the relevant period. Unmeasured factors such as smoking, genetic predisposition, or blood transfusion history may have confounded the results. The study used two hospitals in one academic medical system, so results may not apply to small or rural hospitals.

Declared interests

The supplied text does not report author conflicts of interest. The publication types list NIH extramural research support.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that removing the catheter after a positive urine culture prevents bloodstream infection. This was an observational case-control study, and patients who kept catheters may have been sicker or had chronic catheters, so the association may reflect illness severity rather than the catheter itself.

Read it on PubMed →