Risk assessment of recordable occupational hearing loss in the mining industry.
Kan Sun, Amanda S Azman, Hugo E Camargo and 1 others
PMID 31282793WHAT IT FOUND
Recordable hearing loss rates were highest in coal mines, then metal/non-metal and stone/sand/gravel mines.
Stone/sand/gravel rates increased since 2000, and miners starting after 2000 still had early hearing changes.
Key findings
01The incidence rate of recordable occupational hearing loss was highest in coal mines, followed by metal/non-metal mines and stone/sand/gravel mines.
02Stone/sand/gravel incidence rates increased continuously since 2000, especially in underground and surface operations.
03Among miners who started after 2000, around one-fifth had 1-3 years of mining experience before a standard threshold shift was observed, and an average of 40% across commodity types had 5-10 years of mining experience.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they found
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The study counted recordable hearing loss incidences, not unique affected miners. It could not tell whether different miners at the same mine developed hearing impairment or whether the same miner had multiple hearing shifts. It included only mine operator employees and excluded contractors, so it does not describe the whole mining workforce. Occupation-level incidence rates could not be calculated because the data did not provide the number of employees by occupation. Occupation counts combine risk and employment size. Mining experience was available only for miners who had a standard threshold shift, not for the entire workforce, so experience categories may be biased. The analysis relied on reported recordable hearing loss rather than audiograms, so under-reporting and differences between recorders are likely.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that hearing conservation programmes failed. The study counted recorded hearing loss cases, not unique miners, and it did not measure programme implementation, noise exposure, or non-occupational noise.