RNCohortRevista brasileira de enfermagem2024

Risk assessment for postoperative complications in patients undergoing cardiac surgical procedures.

Carolina Larrosa de Almeida, Jones Sidnei Barbosa de Oliveira, Cláudia Geovana da Silva Pires and 1 others

PMID 39319964

WHAT IT FOUND

High Tuman Score risk was linked to pulmonary and neurological complications after cardiac surgery, but not to cardiac or infectious complications; most of 70 patients were low risk.

Key findings

01Of 70 selected cardiac surgical procedures, 41 (58.57%) were low risk, 27 (38.57%) moderate risk, and 2 (2.85%) high risk on the Tuman Score.

02High Tuman Score risk was associated with pulmonary complications (relative risk 1.32, p=0.002) and neurological complications (relative risk 1.20, p=0.047) compared with low risk.

03Cardiac complications were the most frequent postoperative events (n=16), followed by infection (n=6), but the high-risk cardiac relative risk of 1.65 was not confirmed (p=0.625).

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study was small and non-probabilistic: 70 selected cardiac surgical procedures, and only 2 patients were high risk. It was retrospective and record-based at one university hospital, so it cannot show that the score causes or prevents complications. The authors state the sample was reduced by the COVID-19 pandemic and suspension of elective procedures. The high-risk group was very small, so the pulmonary and neurological associations need cautious interpretation.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that using the Tuman Score prevents complications or that it predicts cardiac complications after cardiac surgery. The study was observational, only 2 patients were high risk, and the high-risk cardiac complication association was not significant (p=0.625).

Read it on PubMed →