RNCohortRevista latino-americana de enfermagem2019

Risk assessment for perioperative pressure injuries.

Camila de Assunção Peixoto, Maria Beatriz Guimarães Ferreira, Márcia Marques Dos Santos Felix and 3 others

PMID 30698218

WHAT IT FOUND

In 278 elective surgery patients, most scored high risk for pressure injury, and 77% had pressure injuries from surgical positioning.

Nurses can use a perioperative pressure injury risk score to flag high-risk patients.

Key findings

01Of 278 patients, 157 (56.5%) were classified as high risk for perioperative pressure injury by the ELPO scale.

0277% (214) of patients presented pressure injuries due to surgical position, most at stage 1, with one stage 2 injury and one deep tissue injury.

03Female sex, elderly age, and altered BMI were significantly associated with higher ELPO risk.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Recruitment was non-probabilistic, and the study was done in one teaching hospital, so the patients may not represent other surgical settings. 591 of 869 patients were excluded, so the final sample may not reflect all elective surgical patients. The study is observational and descriptive, so it cannot show that the ELPO score, positioning choices, or support surfaces caused or prevented pressure injuries. The authors reported that microclimate was not assessed and patients were not followed further in the postoperative period.

Declared interests

The study was supported by CNPq and CAPES in Brazil, and the article is based on a master's thesis. The supplied text does not report other conflicts of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the 77% pressure injury rate or the high-risk ELPO scores as proof that the ELPO scale prevents injuries. The study observed patients and did not compare a prevention strategy, so it cannot show that the scale or positioning changes reduce injuries.

Read it on PubMed →