Reliability of upper limb kinematic variables: adults with unilateral cerebral palsy performing a standardized drinking task.
Camilla Aksdal, Viven Jørgensen, Arve Opheim and 1 others
PMID 41222126WHAT IT FOUND
In adults with spastic unilateral CP, a motion-capture drinking task gave repeatable upper limb movement results over consecutive days.
Small day-to-day differences were usually measurement noise; changes above the reported change thresholds likely reflect real movement differences.
Key findings
01All drinking-task kinematic variables had test-retest ICC values from 0.93 to 0.99.
02For max trunk displacement, SEM was 9.9 mm and SRD was 27.3 mm; for total movement time, SEM was 1.0 s and SRD was 3.9 s.
03After outlier removal, all variables still had ICC values above 0.90.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Only 25 adults were tested, and the authors note that there is no established consensus on the required number of participants for these reliability estimates. Most participants had high function, with 60% at GMFCS I and 40% at MACS I, so the results may not apply to more severely affected adults. The reliability estimates apply only when the same marker placement, cup setup, seating, and testing conditions are used. The model did not measure finger, thumb, forearm rotation, wrist deviation, or head and trunk rotation, which can affect grasp in cerebral palsy. Participants did not use their regular hand or finger orthosis, which could change how they grasp the cup. Only the most affected limb was tested, not the least affected limb. Optical motion capture requires a laboratory and technical expertise, so it is not intended for routine clinic use. Three participants had outlier values, and outliers can raise ICC values, although all variables remained above 0.90 after outlier removal.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read the high reliability as proof that the drinking task improves function. This study measured whether motion-capture variables repeated across two days; it did not test a treatment effect.
Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →