Relationship of Spinal Cord Injury Level and Duration to Peak Aerobic Capacity With Arms-Only and Hybrid Functional Electrical Stimulation Rowing.
Rebecca F Shaffer, Glen Picard, J Andrew Taylor
PMID 29406401WHAT IT FOUND
In 24 people with spinal cord injury, FES-rowing, combining arm rowing with leg electrical stimulation, produced higher peak aerobic capacity than arms-only rowing, averaging 20.8% higher.
Larger differences occurred with higher injury levels and injuries under 2 years.
Key findings
01FES-rowing, which uses arm rowing synchronized with electrical stimulation of the legs, produced a higher VO2 peak than arms-only rowing in all subjects, averaging 20.8% higher.
02The difference in VO2 peak between arms-only rowing and FES-rowing was inversely related to injury level, with greater relative improvements in people with higher injury levels.
03People injured less than 2 years had a greater percent increase in VO2 peak with FES-rowing than people injured more than 2 years (24 ± 2% vs. 14 ± 2%, p<0.05).
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The study included only 24 young adults, aged 22 to 35 years, with adult onset spinal cord injury, so it may not apply to people outside this age range or with injury from childhood. Participants were excluded if they used cardioactive drugs or had cardiovascular or pulmonary disease, diabetes, other neurological disorders, pressure injuries, or other contraindications to vigorous exercise, so the findings may not apply to people with common SCI comorbidities. Two-thirds of the sample was less than 2 years post injury, so people with long-standing injury were less represented. The study measured peak aerobic capacity during exercise tests after about 5 weeks of supervised FES familiarization, not long-term training outcomes, daily function, or health complications. Only two people had AIS C motor incomplete injury, so the study could not determine whether injury completeness changes the response. The leg strengthening device used in the protocol was not FDA approved. Peak heart rate increased with FES-rowing in 15 of 24 people, but the overall difference was not statistically significant, so heart rate response is less certain.
Declared interests
The paper is tagged as NIH extramural research support. No author conflict declaration is included in the supplied text.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that FES-rowing is a proven training intervention for improving health outcomes. This study measured peak aerobic capacity after supervised familiarization in 24 young adults, and the leg-strengthening device used was not FDA approved. The 20.8% higher VO2 peak is an acute test difference, not evidence of improved daily function.