Relationship between prematurity and difficulties in the transition of food consistency in childhood: a systematic review.
Hellen Nataly Correia Lagos Guimarães, Renata Henrique Petreça, Sheila Tamanini de Almeida and 5 others
PMID 38836827WHAT IT FOUND
Most included studies found no clear link between prematurity and trouble moving through food textures.
Some studies reported early complementary feeding, lower gestational age links to feeding difficulty, and oral motor signs such as gagging or refusal.
Key findings
01Seven of the nine included studies reported complementary feeding before six months corrected age.
02Lower gestational age was associated with increased frequency of feeding difficulties.
03No included study reported that participants received feeding guidance or rehabilitation.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Only nine observational studies were included, with samples from 15 to 85 infants, so the review cannot show that prematurity causes feeding difficulty. The studies used different oral motor assessment tools, and no ideal standard instrument exists. Combining results statistically was therefore not possible. Some included studies had moderate risk of bias because they did not use random samples, did not describe dropouts, or did not assess outcomes objectively. The timing of solid introduction changes depending on whether chronological or corrected age is used, so clinicians need to know which age the study applied. No included study reported feeding guidance or rehabilitation, so the review cannot say how therapy might change texture progression.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that prematurity by itself causes feeding difficulties or that texture progression is predictable from gestational age. Most included studies found no link, and the reported links were observational and inconsistent.