PTOTRNQualitativeInternational journal of nursing sciences2023

Real-life experience of accepting assistive device services for Tibetans with dysfunction: A qualitative study.

Jun Luo, Zhujizhaba Gama, Deji Gesang and 5 others

PMID 36860713

WHAT IT FOUND

Ten Tibetan adults who used assistive devices said the devices helped daily life and eased family care, but poor fitting, unsafe paths, fall fear, and stigma made them hard to use.

They wanted local professional guidance and financial support.

Key findings

01Participants said assistive devices helped daily activities and reduced the need for family to stay with them.

02Participants reported difficulty accessing professional services, little instruction, fear of falling, stigma, and environments unsuited to their devices.

03Participants wanted community-level professional help, financial support, and safer paths or handrails.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTsWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Only ten people were interviewed, all from Lhasa, Tibet, and all already used assistive devices, so it does not show what people in other places or non-users experience. The study reports experiences, not measured outcomes, so it cannot show that assistive devices or services improve function or reduce burden. Data were collected in one cultural and language context with purposive sampling, so themes may not transfer to other groups.

Declared interests

The study was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China and the Key Research and Development Program Jointly Implemented by Sichuan and Chongqing. The authors declared no conflict of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the reported benefits as evidence that assistive devices cause improved function or less caregiver burden. The study only asked ten Tibetan people about their experiences, so it cannot show effectiveness or apply to other groups.

Read it on PubMed →