Reactive stepping with functional neuromuscular stimulation in response to forward-directed perturbations.
Alexander J Hunt, Brooke M Odle, Lisa M Lombardo and 2 others
PMID 28601095WHAT IT FOUND
In one person with motor complete T4 paraplegia, implanted stimulation triggered a protective forward step after pulls above 10% body weight, but standing still required hand support and fall risk remained.
Key findings
01The controller used three body-mounted accelerometers and initiated a reactive FNS step when forward perturbations were larger than 10% body weight.
02After two practice steps were excluded, 29 analysed pulls at 15% and 17.5% body weight all produced reactive steps with forward foot progression.
03The neuroprosthesis did not make standing self-stabilizing; the person still had to exert substantial forces on the walker handles.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Only one person with motor complete T4 paraplegia was tested, so the result cannot be generalized to other people with spinal cord injury. The controller was tuned with this one subject in the loop, and thresholds were set empirically, so it may not work the same way in another person. Testing was done in a laboratory with the person holding walker handles and wearing a safety harness, so real-world standing without support was not shown. Only forward perturbations and stepping with the right leg were tested. Step length was 163 mm, around half the length reported for able-bodied adults, and the paper says it is difficult to know whether this step would be sufficient for stabilization. The device did not reduce upper-extremity load or make standing self-stabilizing. The able-bodied comparison values are taken from earlier reports, not measured in this experiment.
Declared interests
The supplied text lists funding from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs; it does not state an author conflict-of-interest declaration.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that this controller makes standing with an implanted neuroprosthesis safe or self-stabilizing. It was tested in one person in a laboratory with a walker and harness, and the person still had to exert substantial forces on the walker handles to maintain balance.