SLPOtherJournal of autism and developmental disorders2016

Ratings of Broader Autism Phenotype and Personality Traits in Optimal Outcomes from Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Joyce Suh, Alyssa Orinstein, Marianne Barton and 4 others

PMID 27538964

WHAT IT FOUND

Children who no longer met autism criteria were rated by unfamiliar raters as more talkative and assertive than typically developing peers, yet more likely to get sidetracked in conversation, lose their point, and talk too much.

Key findings

01Children with optimal outcomes were rated similarly to typically developing peers on overall autism-like traits and most personality domains, while children with high-functioning autism were rated as more aloof, rigid, and having more pragmatic language difficulties.

02Children with optimal outcomes were rated more extraverted than typically developing and high-functioning autism peers, especially more talkative and assertive and less shy, reserved, and inhibited.

03Children with optimal outcomes differed from typically developing peers on some conversation and attention items, including getting sidetracked, losing track of their point, and talking too much.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study did not follow children over time, so it cannot show whether extraversion helped them lose an autism diagnosis or simply followed it. The sample was small and recruited through media, clinics, and therapists, so it may not represent all children who achieve an optimal outcome. Ratings came from short clips of a structured assessment with an adult stranger, not from everyday peer interaction, so they may not show how children behave in real social settings. Naïve raters may not detect internal traits such as neuroticism well, and the study did not use self, parent, or peer ratings. Many comparisons were made without correction for chance, so some subtle differences could be false positives. The sample was mostly Caucasian, so results may not apply to children from other racial or ethnic backgrounds.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that children with optimal outcomes have no social communication or attention concerns. They were rated similarly to typically developing peers overall, but they were still rated more likely to get sidetracked, lose their point, and talk too much, and the study did not show whether these differences affect daily life.

Read it on PubMed →