SLPOtherJournal of autism and developmental disorders2019

Rates of Co-occurring Psychiatric Disorders in Autism Spectrum Disorder Using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview.

Maya G Mosner, Jessica L Kinard, Jasmine S Shah and 5 others

PMID 31175504

WHAT IT FOUND

Most children and adolescents with autism had current psychiatric diagnoses, but these often did not match community diagnoses.

Young adults showed lower self-reported rates.

Key findings

01In the child and adolescent group, 32 of 35 participants (91%) had at least one current co-occurring psychiatric diagnosis on the caregiver interview.

02Agreement between interview diagnoses and community diagnoses was poor for children and adolescents: 55% (38 of 69) of interview-reported current diagnoses were not supported by community diagnoses.

03In young adults, 10 of 32 participants (31%) had at least one current co-occurring diagnosis by self-report, while community diagnoses reported one or more diagnoses in 41% (13).

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The sample was small and recruited from one university registry, and the authors describe it as a convenience sample with predominantly Caucasian and high SES participants. Only participants with fluent phrase speech and nonverbal IQ above 70 were included, so the findings do not apply to people with ASD who are non-speaking or have intellectual disability. Children and adolescents were assessed by caregiver report, while young adults were assessed by self-report, so the two age groups were not measured in the same way. The young adult MINI did not assess ADHD, although community diagnoses included it, and community-reported rates were higher than MINI-reported rates. Community diagnoses were not verified with detailed documentation, so poor agreement could reflect differences in how diagnoses were made rather than only measurement error. Gender analyses were exploratory because few female participants were included. The study reported current diagnosis rates and agreement, not treatment response, therapy outcomes, or the effect of any intervention.

Declared interests

All named authors declared no conflicts of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the high child and adolescent rate as proof that the brief interview should replace clinical assessment. The sample was small, caregiver report was used, and agreement with community diagnoses was poor.

Read it on PubMed →