Quality of Life, Physical Activity Participation, and Perceptions of Physical Rehabilitation Among Community-Reintegrated Veterans With Lower Limb Amputation in Sri Lanka: Convergent Parallel Mixed Methods Study.
Ashan Wijekoon, Dilanthi Gamage Dona, Subashini Jayawardana and 1 others
PMID 38869933WHAT IT FOUND
Veterans with lower limb amputation in Sri Lanka had poorer quality of life and less physical activity than matched controls, and most did not meet recommended activity levels.
They wanted simple, home-based, peer-supported exercise programs. No program was tested.
Key findings
01Veterans with lower limb amputation had lower physical and mental quality of life scores than the comparison group.
02Fifty-nine of 79 veterans did not meet the recommended physical activity level, and 34 of 79 were classified as sedentary.
03Veterans expected a future community rehabilitation program to have two to three sessions per week and be delivered through veteran societies.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
This was a cross-sectional survey and interviews, so it cannot show that lack of community rehabilitation caused lower quality of life or physical activity. It did not test a community rehabilitation program, so the preferences reported by veterans are not evidence that such a program works. Participants were all male Sri Lankan veterans with war-related unilateral lower limb amputation living in military villages, so findings may not apply to civilians, women, people with bilateral amputation, vascular amputation, or other countries. Physical activity and quality of life were self reported, and the physical activity analysis used 79 veterans and 82 controls, not the full 85 in each group. The paper does not explain why fewer participants were analysed for physical activity. Qualitative interviews included 25 veterans selected purposively, so they describe these participants' views rather than all veterans.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read the lower quality of life and physical activity in veterans as proof that a community rehabilitation program would improve them. This study did not test an intervention; it described current status and preferences.