Psychosocial Distress Among Young Men Who Have Sex With Men: A Scoping Review.
Isaac K Payton, Angela R Starkweather, Shantrel S Canidate and 2 others
PMID 38537109WHAT IT FOUND
Stigma, discrimination, violence, incarceration and money problems were linked to distress in young men who have sex with men, and distress was linked to risky behavior, lower medication adherence and detectable viral load.
Key findings
01Stressors associated with psychosocial distress included HIV-positive status, stigma, discrimination, insufficient resources, exposure to community violence and incarceration.
02Men who experienced sexual orientation discrimination had four-times greater odds of reporting psychological distress than men without such discrimination.
03Young men with HIV who had more community violence exposure and higher distress had lower odds of medication adherence (adjusted odds ratio 0.36).
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
All eight included studies were cross-sectional, so they measured stressors and outcomes at one time and cannot show that distress caused risky behavior or poor HIV outcomes. No study explicitly measured psychosocial distress; they used different measures of psychological distress, anxiety or depression, so the findings may not capture social threat stressors. The search used terms for men who have sex with men and may have missed studies using other sexuality language. Only studies from the United States published in the past 10 years, in English, and with men who self-identified as homosexual or bisexual were included, so transgender people, other sexual minority groups and other countries are not represented. Most samples were predominantly Black or African American men, and six of the eight studies had sample sizes small enough to limit generalizability. Age was handled inconsistently across studies, with only half focusing on younger men and some analyses not stratifying by age.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read this as proof that distress causes poor HIV outcomes or that a distress screen will improve viral suppression. All included studies were cross-sectional, and no included study measured psychosocial distress directly, so the review can identify associations but cannot establish cause and effect.