Psychometric evaluation of the PROMIS parent proxy mobility item bank for use in Duchenne muscular dystrophy.
Linda Pax Lowes, Corinne M Le Reun, Lindsay N Alfano and 4 others
PMID 39697056WHAT IT FOUND
A parent-report mobility questionnaire for ambulatory boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy can be reduced to a shorter set of items that consistently rank activities from easiest to hardest.
It separates children well by mobility, except at the highest levels.
Key findings
01The revised 19-item parent proxy mobility measure showed good overall model fit and excellent separation of mobility levels.
02The easiest items were moving legs, walking across the room, and getting out of bed without help; the hardest were running a mile and riding a bike.
03The item set left a gap at high mobility levels, so it may not target the best mobility well.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Only caregivers of ambulatory boys aged 4 to 12 years at one neuromuscular clinic were included, so it may not apply to girls, older children, non-ambulatory patients, or other care settings. The analysis excluded patients aged 13 years and older because loss of ambulation was likely, so the measure was not tested near the transition to wheelchair use. Sociodemographic information was not collected to avoid identifying patients, so the authors could not check whether items behave differently across background groups. Differential item functioning could not be properly investigated, and the age-group signal for one item was not treated as definitive. The measure had a gap at high mobility levels, so it may not differentiate children with the best mobility. No comparison with directly relevant PROMIS parent proxy mobility literature was available.
Declared interests
The authors declared no conflicts of interest. The work was funded by Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that the revised measure is ready for all children with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. It was analysed in one clinic in ambulatory boys aged 4 to 12 years, and the authors call for validation in another independent sample.