RNSystematic ReviewPatient education and counseling2018

Psychoeducational interventions in adolescent depression: A systematic review.

Rhys Bevan Jones, Anita Thapar, Zoe Stone and 4 others

PMID 29103882

WHAT IT FOUND

Psychoeducation for adolescents with or at risk of depression may improve family understanding, communication and some mood or behaviour outcomes, but the evidence is too small and mixed to show it reliably works.

Key findings

01Fifteen studies of psychoeducational interventions for adolescents with depression or at high risk were identified.

02The review found that psychoeducational interventions may help understanding, communication, behaviour and mood, but evidence is too limited to conclude they are effective.

03Most included programmes were delivered in person and involved families or groups facilitated by a professional.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The 15 included studies varied widely in participants, interventions, delivery methods, outcomes and study design, so the review could not combine them into one overall estimate. Many studies were small, had short follow-up, or were at various stages from early development to efficacy testing. Several randomised trials had unclear or high risk of bias, especially around blinding and selective reporting. Psychoeducation was often mixed with other treatments or compared with different control conditions, so the effect of psychoeducation alone is hard to separate. The review only included English-language studies, and most studies came from high-income countries, so findings may not transfer to all settings. The definition of psychoeducation was inconsistent, and some programmes overlapped with psychological therapies such as cognitive behavioural therapy.

Declared interests

The supplied metadata lists non-U.S. government research support, but no author conflict-of-interest or funding statement is given in the article text.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read this review as proof that psychoeducation works for adolescent depression. The authors found only 15 varied studies and state it is not possible to conclude that psychoeducational interventions are effective.

Read it on PubMed →