SLPQualitativeAutism : the international journal of research and practice2024

Provider perspectives on equity in use of mobile health autism screening tools.

Katharine E Zuckerman, Luis Andres Rivas Vazquez, Yesenia Morales Santos and 7 others

PMID 38078430

WHAT IT FOUND

Providers worry families confuse mobile screening results with a diagnosis.

They need tools that are short, work on slow internet, and clearly state they are not diagnostic to avoid alarming parents or wasting clinic time.

Key findings

01Providers fear parents will mistake a positive mobile screen for a diagnosis, especially if the tool does not clearly distinguish screening from diagnostic evaluation.

02Adoption is blocked by practical barriers: tools must be short (under 15 minutes for parents), work with low bandwidth, and integrate with electronic health records to be useful in busy clinics.

03Trust in a tool depends heavily on familiarity; providers immediately recognized and trusted the M-CHAT, while unfamiliar tools required extra time to research validity.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study focused only on front-line providers, not specialists or families. Providers did not use the tools themselves; they only viewed result screenshots, which may have missed usability issues. The sample was recruited through professional networks, which may introduce bias. The study was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, which may have influenced providers' views on remote screening.

Declared interests

One author is on the scientific advisory board of a company that develops autism screening technology. Funding was provided by the National Institutes of Health.

The easy way to misread this

Do not assume these tools are ready for clinical use. The providers interviewed expressed significant concerns about validity, equity, and workflow integration, indicating that current mobile screening tools may exacerbate disparities if adopted without careful consideration of their limitations.

Read it on PubMed →