Prevention and Reduction of Anxiety in Autistic Preschoolers Through an Autism-Specific Parent-Mediated Intervention: A Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial Evaluating Short and Longer Term Outcomes.
Dawn Adams, Stephanie Malone, Nicole Dargue and 6 others
PMID 39325290WHAT IT FOUND
Parents completing a six-session autism-specific anxiety program saw their preschoolers' anxiety around uncertainty drop significantly.
General anxiety scores also fell. No negative effects were reported. The study was underpowered, so these results are promising but not definitive.
Key findings
01The intervention group showed a significant reduction in total anxiety and uncertainty-specific anxiety compared to baseline, with medium to large effect sizes, while the control group did not change.
02There were no significant differences between groups in measures of intolerance of uncertainty or parental internalising problems.
03No parents reported any negative or adverse events from the intervention activities.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The study was underpowered, recruiting 57 participants against a target of 64, and is explicitly described as a pilot. The intervention group had significantly higher baseline anxiety scores than the control group, which complicates between-group comparisons and raises the possibility of regression to the mean. Outcomes were based solely on parent-report, and parents were aware of their group allocation, introducing potential bias. The 'longer-term' follow-up was only about 15 months, which is insufficient to determine if benefits persist through childhood. Families with lower incomes were more likely to drop out, limiting the generalisability of the findings to these groups.
Declared interests
The authors declared no competing interests. The study was funded by the Australian Research Council and Griffith University.
The easy way to misread this
Do not interpret the lack of significant between-group differences in total anxiety at follow-up as a failure of the intervention. The intervention group started with higher anxiety levels than the control group, so their significant within-group reduction represents a convergence towards the control group's baseline rather than a lack of effect. However, given the small sample size and baseline imbalance, these findings require confirmation in a fully powered trial.
Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →