RNCohortNursing research2020

Prediction of Cognitive Ability With Social Determinants in Children of Low Birth Weight.

Lisa M Blair, Jodi L Ford, P Cristian Gugiu and 3 others

PMID 33141526

WHAT IT FOUND

For children born at low birth weight, adding family and social information to birth weight and gestational age improved prediction of school-age cognitive scores, but no single factor was conclusive.

Key findings

01The standard care model using birth weight and gestational age explained 9% of variance in the cognitive composite.

02The final model predicted 35% of total variance, contributing an additional 26% of variance explained compared with the standard care model.

03No individual predictors were statistically significant within any model.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Only 133 of 204 children who met initial criteria completed at least one outcome measure at about age 9, and the authors note possible attrition bias. No individual predictor was statistically significant, so the effect sizes for single social factors cannot be treated as reliable stand-alone markers. The model used only information available at birth or before hospital discharge, so later family, neighbourhood, and health experiences were not captured. Early intervention services received by children were not controlled for, which may have affected the apparent relationships with birth weight and gestational age. The cohort was born in 1998 to 2000, and changes in social stigma and neonatal care may limit generalisation to current patients. Estimates for some racial and ethnic groups may be less stable because few children belonged to those groups.

Declared interests

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not treat the final model as a validated screening tool for individual children. No single predictor was statistically significant, and the authors caution that the reported effect sizes may capitalize on chance in a small sample.

Read it on PubMed →