SLPCohortTrends in hearing2022

Predicting 9-Year Language Ability from Preschool Speech Recognition in Noise in Children Using Cochlear Implants.

Teresa Y C Ching, Linda Cupples, Vicky W Zhang

PMID 36285469

WHAT IT FOUND

Speech perception in noise at 5 years predicted better language at 9 years in 56 children with cochlear implants.

Vocabulary at 5 years did not independently predict later speech perception in noise.

Key findings

015-year speech perception in noise significantly predicted 9-year language, and the full model accounted for 70.0% of variance.

025-year receptive vocabulary did not significantly predict 9-year speech perception in noise after 5-year speech perception was controlled.

03Speech perception in noise improved over time, with a significant mean difference of 4.5 dB.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study reported correlational associations rather than causal effects. Cross-lagged analysis used only two time points, so it provides a weak test of direction. The sample was 56 children using cochlear implants who spoke English at home, had nonverbal IQ above 75, and received implants before 4 years, so results may not apply to children using hearing aids, children using other communication modes, or children with lower nonverbal IQ. Speech perception at 5 years was measured with either word or sentence tests, although test type did not significantly affect the models. The findings apply to the change from preschool to school age, not to other developmental periods.

Declared interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest. The work was partly funded by the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders of the National Institutes of Health under grant R01DC008080.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that better speech perception in noise will cause better language, or that speech perception training will improve language. The paper reports correlational longitudinal associations, and cross-lagged analysis with two time points cannot establish causality.

Read it on PubMed →