Positive risk-taking within social care for adults with physical disabilities: A review of guidelines in practice in England.
Leanne Field, Liana Nagy, Tarnya Knaggs and 1 others
PMID 40337471WHAT IT FOUND
Guidance on positive risk-taking for adults with physical disabilities varies widely across England.
Only 21 relevant documents were found, with inconsistent definitions and risk grading. Service user views were absent.
Key findings
01Only 21 documents met eligibility criteria and were reviewed.
02The reviewed guidance lacked consistent definitions of positive risk-taking and did not reflect service user views.
03Risk matrices were inconsistent, and the descriptor minor appeared at three different grading stages.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Only 106 of 152 Local Authorities with adult social care services were contactable, and only 36 responded, so the review may miss guidance used elsewhere. Documents came from Local Authorities across England but not all areas, so findings may not represent every adult social care service. The review was completed during the pandemic, which may have affected responses. The reference lists of documents were not fully explored, so some cited guidance may have been missed. Only a 20% second review of extracted data was done. The documents did not appear to include service user views, so their relevance to adults' preferences is uncertain.
Declared interests
Two authors work for Wokingham Borough Council, which provided one of the reviewed documents. The review was part of a PhD funded by Health Education England Thames Valley through the INTALECA programme at Oxford Brookes University. One author is supported by the NIHR Oxford Health Biomedical Research Centre.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read this as evidence that positive risk-taking improves safety or participation. It reviewed documents used in adult social care, not patient outcomes, and only 21 documents were included.