Physical Activity Interventions Within Occupational Therapy for Persons With Substance Use Disorder: A Systematic Review.
Amanda Acord-Vira, Kayleigh Nolan, Tracy Rice and 5 others
PMID 41109893WHAT IT FOUND
All ten yoga studies and all seven tai chi studies reported benefits for people with substance use disorder: fewer cravings, better mood, sleep and quality of life.
High-intensity training results were mixed, and dance and music did not reduce substance use.
Key findings
01The 28 included studies used yoga (10 studies), tai chi (7), comprehensive integrated programmes (6), high-intensity and circuit training (3), and music or dance (2).
02Every one of the ten yoga studies reported statistically significant benefits, and the review graded yoga as strong evidence for reducing stress and anger and improving overall health and well-being in people with substance use disorder.
03Seven tai chi studies reported better quality of life, sleep, mental health, balance, blood pressure and heart rate, and fewer drug cravings, which the review graded as strong evidence for improving overall health.
04High-intensity and circuit training drew only moderate evidence: one trial found no differences between groups in craving or heart rate, and another found no significant differences between groups in fitness or cravings.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Most of the studies were not run by occupational therapy practitioners, so the reviewers say the profession's own role cannot be worked out from them. The studies differed in how they were designed and analysed, which the authors say reduces how strong the combined conclusions can be. Results are described study by study and grouped into themes rather than pooled, so the review does not say how large any benefit is or how confident we can be in the size of it. The final 28 studies were all rated Level 1 to 3, but the wider search included case studies, single-subject designs, observational cohorts and grey literature such as poster presentations, which is a wide range of quality underneath the headline grades. Only articles published in English were included, so relevant work in other languages is missing.
Declared interests
No funding source and no conflict of interest statement appear anywhere in the article text provided, so it is not possible to say who paid for this work or what the authors declared.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read this as proof that occupational therapy practitioners delivering exercise improves substance use outcomes. Most of the studies in the review were not run by occupational therapy practitioners, and the authors say the profession's own role therefore cannot be established from them. 'Strong evidence' here means that several well-designed trials pointed the same way, not that the size of the benefit has been measured.
Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →