SLPSystematic ReviewDysphagia2026

Pharyngolaryngeal Abnormalities viewed via nasoendoscopy associated with Oropharyngeal Dysphagia in Adults: A Scoping Review.

Sarah Boggiano, Amy Freeman-Sanderson, Anna Miles and 3 others

PMID 40982047

WHAT IT FOUND

Scoping review of 117 articles links specific pharyngolaryngeal abnormalities seen on FEES to dysphagia.

Unilateral vocal fold impairment and edema show consistent associations with aspiration. Most other abnormalities lack statistical evidence, so treat FEES findings as part of a broader assessment rather than definitive causes.

Key findings

01Unilateral vocal fold motion impairment is associated with aspiration (RR 1.49) and residue (80% prevalence).

02Incomplete glottic closure is associated with secretion accumulation (84% prevalence) and aspiration (63% prevalence).

03Edema of unspecified location is associated with aspiration (RR 2.46, 45% prevalence).

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The review excluded studies using videofluoroscopy or other assessment tools, limiting generalizability to FEES specifically. Most included studies were observational or case series, preventing causal conclusions. Heterogeneous terminology and outcome measures across studies made direct comparison difficult. Many PLAs were reported concurrently, making it impossible to isolate the effect of a single abnormality.

Declared interests

The study was funded by the University of Technology Sydney. No other conflicts of interest were declared.

The easy way to misread this

Do not assume that every abnormality seen on FEES causes dysphagia. The review found strong statistical associations only for a subset of abnormalities, such as unilateral vocal fold motion impairment and edema. For many other findings, the evidence is limited to co-occurrence in case reports or small studies, meaning they may be incidental rather than causative.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →