PTNarrative ReviewArchives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation2025

Phantom Limb Pain Assessment Tools: A Literature Review Exploring Strengths and Limitations.

Alexandra N Jenson, Benjamin Branch, Janelle M Richard and 1 others

PMID 40678285

WHAT IT FOUND

No existing phantom limb pain assessment tool adequately distinguishes between pain, sensations, and residual limb pain.

Most tools used in research are single-question pain scales that miss these differences, leaving clinicians without a standard way to diagnose these conditions accurately.

Key findings

01Unidimensional pain scales are the most widely used tools for phantom limb pain studies, but they focus solely on pain intensity and do not distinguish between phantom limb pain, phantom limb sensations, and residual limb pain.

02Of the multidimensional tools specifically designed for phantom limb pain, none successfully included questions to differentiate between all three post-amputation conditions while also using descriptor words to characterize the quality of pain and sensations.

03The lack of a standardized, validated measurement tool for these conditions creates inconsistency in research and complicates the development of individualized treatment plans in clinical settings.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

This is a narrative review of existing tools, not a study of patient outcomes or test performance, so it cannot tell you which tool is most accurate for a specific patient. The review relied on how the original studies described their use of tools, and some tools may have been modified in ways that were not reported in the source papers. Completion times for many tools were estimated by the authors based on the number of questions, rather than measured in practice.

Declared interests

The authors declared no competing interests, funding, or financial benefits.

The easy way to misread this

Do not interpret this review as evidence that a specific tool, such as the Numerical Rating Scale, is inaccurate for measuring pain intensity. The finding is that these tools are incomplete for diagnosing phantom limb conditions because they do not ask separate questions about pain, sensations, and residual limb pain.

Read it on PubMed →