SLPOtherCoDAS2022

Performance of adolescents in oral narrative discourse and associated factors.

Samantha Gomes Araújo, Vanessa de Oliveira Martins-Reis, Erica de Araújo Brandão Couto and 1 others

PMID 35442347

WHAT IT FOUND

Adolescents with typical development named pictures better when they retold stories more completely.

School year, age, memory and general oral language scores did not predict narrative performance. The MAC Battery narrative task appears usable for Brazilian Portuguese adolescents without adaptation.

Key findings

01Picture naming was the only variable that predicted performance in oral narrative discourse tasks.

02There was no statistically significant effect between narrative discourse and school year, age, memory, and overall oral language score.

03The MAC Battery narrative discourse task appears adequate for adolescents without adaptation.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The sample was homogeneous, consisting only of adolescents with typical development from public schools, so results may not apply to those with language disorders or private school backgrounds. The study did not assess spontaneous narrative, only retelling after listening to a text. The memory and oral language tests used may have been too easy for typically developing adolescents, masking potential associations. The study was exploratory and did not pre-register outcomes.

Declared interests

No specific funding or conflict of interest declarations are provided in the text.

The easy way to misread this

Do not assume that age or school year predicts narrative ability in adolescents. This study found no significant association between age, grade, memory, or general oral language scores and narrative performance. Only picture naming was predictive.

Read it on PubMed →