SLPOtherJournal of intellectual disability research : JIDR2025

Performance-Based Executive Functions Predict Internalising but Not Externalising Maladaptive Behaviour in Students With ID.

Stephan Kehl, Nina Römer

PMID 40760791

WHAT IT FOUND

In students with intellectual disability, better working memory predicted more internalising symptoms like anxiety and depression, but executive functions did not predict externalising behaviours such as aggression or hyperactivity.

Key findings

01Executive functions explained a significant proportion of variance in internalising maladaptive behaviour but not in externalising maladaptive behaviour.

02Working memory significantly predicted internalising maladaptive behaviour.

03Inhibition significantly predicted anxiety when controlling for fluid intelligence, age and sex.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The sample size was small (N = 45), leading to low statistical power for correlational analyses. The sample was not representative of all students with ID, as those with severe intellectual disabilities who could not complete performance-based tasks were excluded. Maladaptive behaviour was assessed only via teacher reports, not multi-perspective (e.g., parent) reports, which may miss internalising symptoms that occur outside school. The study used a preschool version of the BASC-3 for students with a mean age of 11.82 years, which may not adequately capture symptoms in older or higher-functioning students. The customised executive function measures had limited established reliability and validity, particularly for working memory which had low internal consistency. The study was correlational, so it cannot determine causality between executive functions and maladaptive behaviour. Students were referred to special schools based on pedagogical assessment, not necessarily meeting medical diagnostic criteria for ID.

Declared interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not interpret the significant prediction of anxiety by inhibition or internalising behaviour by working memory as evidence that targeting these executive functions will reduce symptoms. The study is cross-sectional and correlational, so it cannot determine whether executive function deficits cause maladaptive behaviour or vice versa.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →