SLPSurveyCoDAS2022

Perception of speech therapy and education students about their experiences and practices in reading and writing academic genre texts.

Ana Cristina Guarinello, Thiago Mathias de Oliveira, Lilian Dos Santos da Silva and 5 others

PMID 36259819

WHAT IT FOUND

Most speech therapy and education undergraduates reported difficulty reading and writing academic texts.

Speech therapy students reported more difficulty overall, especially with language rules and personal difficulties. Education students more often cited comprehension.

Key findings

0183% of speech therapy students and 63% of education students said they had difficulty reading and writing academic texts.

02Speech therapy students reported more difficulty overall, including language rules (33% vs 12%) and personal difficulties (23% vs 10%).

03Education students more often pointed to comprehension/interpretation (39% vs 26%).

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study used convenience sampling at a single private university in Brazil, so it may not represent other universities or countries. It asked students to report their perceptions, so it did not test their actual reading or writing ability. Questions allowed multiple answers, so percentages can exceed 100%. Some comparisons were not possible because too few responses were available for individual categories. It surveyed students, not practising therapists or patients, so it does not show clinical outcomes.

Declared interests

The work was supported by CAPES, funding code 001.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the higher difficulty percentages as evidence that speech therapy students have a language disorder or need clinical therapy. These are self-reported academic reading and writing difficulties in students, not patients.

Read it on PubMed →