RNSystematic ReviewJournal of advanced nursing2026

Patients' Experiences of Day Surgery: A Qualitative Systematic Review.

Josephine Ransborg Sig, Charlotte Nielsen, Camilla Bille and 2 others

PMID 40159718

WHAT IT FOUND

Patients described day surgery as minor and quick, then felt unprepared and reluctant to call for help when pain, fatigue and emotional distress made home recovery harder than expected.

Key findings

01Across 34 included qualitative studies, patients described day surgery as expected to be simple and quick, which could lead them to underprepare for home recovery.

02Patients reported that postoperative symptoms, including emotional imbalance and fatigue, could be more challenging than the operation itself.

03Patients said they needed practical and emotional support from family and professionals, and described hesitating to call because they doubted their problems were important enough.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Only studies in English, Danish, Norwegian or Swedish were included, so relevant day surgery experience research in other languages may be missing. The search may not have found every relevant qualitative study because qualitative research uses varied terms and indexing. The review synthesises experiences across different operations, so it does not describe a specific procedure. The findings are interpretations of published qualitative studies, not direct patient interviews by the review authors.

Declared interests

The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read this review as evidence that a specific day surgery pathway is unsafe or that a particular education or follow-up programme improves recovery. It synthesises patients' experiences and expectations; it does not test an intervention or measure clinical outcomes.

Read it on PubMed →